The Sandman // Niel Gaiman

Illustrated by Sam Kieth, Mike Dringenberg, Jill Thompson, Shawn McManus, Marc Hempel, Michael Zulli, Todd Klein (lettering), Dave McKean (covers)

Where I got the book
My local library has copies of all the bound collections!

Why I’m reading
Another one of those “I’ll get around to reading it eventually” books. I finally decided to give it a go after I saw Boyhood with a friend, and we got to talking about manga and graphic novels. We also talked about a manga called The Gamer that I'm following now. He specifically told me about one small storyline that sounded awesome: a guy in a bar is bragging that death is for suckers and he’s having none of it; Dream and Death decide it would be fun to go ahead and give him immortality. Dream meets up with him every hundred or so years, and eventually people notice and start thinking they’re some sort of mythical conspiracy. In retrospect, I think my friend made it out to be more ‘hilarious hijinks’ than it actually was.

Expectations
90s goth sensibilities, lots of eyeliner, hijinks and messing around with mortals.

So how was it?

First of all, I may have been hopped up on Vicodin for the first few books. I powered through them in a day and a half after getting my wisdom teeth taken out. I’ve eaten mostly baby food and spaghetti-os for the last week. Fun times.

I liked this a lot more than I thought I would, even though it was less “fun” than I was expecting. I was worried it would be over-dramatic and full of dull tropes, which it wasn’t. I should trust Gaiman at this point, I don’t know what I was thinking.

The graphic novels focus on Dream, the sandman, who is one of seven entities called the Endless. The other six are his family: Desire, Delirium, Despair, Death, Destiny, and Destruction… wow, I just realized they all started with a “D.” They exist as anthropomorphic representations of patterns or concepts in the human psyche. Dream isn’t just involved with sleeping dreams; hopes, creativity, waking dreams, etc., are also his jurisdiction.

The story follows Dream’s capture and escape from a sorcerer, righting his past wrongs, searching for his brother, and defending the dream world. His siblings are major characters, along with his servants and several humans. It’s also a story about stories, with all sorts of interwoven side characters and side stories; sometimes you’ll go an entire chapter barely seeing Dream or one of the other Endless.

The artwork is great: creative, imaginative, without getting to “comicbooky.” Dream is so much 90s Trent Reznor it’s not even funny. With maybe a dash of Alan Rickman for flair. It threw me a little that the artwork changes depending on the story, but once I noticed it was happening, I loved it. It’s very subtle. Dream’s clothes were probably the coolest, especially his cape; not sure how I felt about his helm, it was a little too sci-fi buggy.

Recommendation
For fans of mythology, traditional Gothic and Romantic literature. 

Feels
Somber and introspective, but not depressing. Loving. Sometimes funny.

Favorites
It’s the family dynamic between the Endless that really makes the story, especially Dream’s relationship with Death, Delirium, and Destruction. The characters are anthropomorphic concepts whose behavior is based on what they represent; but at the same time, it’s a very real family dynamic, not some attempt at philosophizing. Gaiman also gets really deep into itty bitty side characters, making them just as interesting and real as the main characters.

In terms of actual characters, I didn’t fixate on just one, which is unusual for me. I loved Dream, but Delirium, Death, Lucien (the librarian!) and Fiddler’s Green were also favorites. Matthew the crow ended up being a surprisingly touching character, as did Despair.

Least favorites
I wouldn’t say that there was anything missing, but I wanted to see the main character, Dream, go wild at least once. The artwork was fantastic, and the conceptualization of Dream’s powers were so imaginative and cool, and we do see him using it in a lot of creative ways. But… I don’t know, I wish there was a chapter or two where we could just see him create. Dream felt a little fenced in, which is entirely keeping with his character, but seeing him let go for a while could have created contrast and would have been satisfying for me as a reader. Basically, I think it could have benefited from a few more artwork-heavy pages with swirly capes.

For characters, there were a whole bunch that I didn’t necessarily connect with, but that’s fine. The only one that was actually a little disappointing was Desire; I felt like we don’t get much insight into the character or the concept, even though s/he gets a lot of screen time. Despair felt deeper, despite having much less screen time and sort of boring powers.

Writing style
Subtle, very subtle. There was a lot left unsaid, lots of little details, intertwining plots, and the story never spoon-fed you meanings or feelings.

Related reading

• William Shakespeare is actually a side character; Dream commissions his plays A Midsummer Night’s Dream and The Tempest. The folklore fairies Titania and Auberon are characters.
• The Sandman is one of only a few graphic novels to make it onto the New York Times Best Seller list, along with Maus, Watchmen, and The Dark Knight Returns.
• Several other DC comic book characters appear, including John Constantine, Batman, and several Justice League characters.

Boyhood // Directed by Richard Linklater {Movie}

A coming-of age drama following a young boy from ages six to eighteen, living in Texas with divorced parents ; filmed in near real-time.

Where I saw the movie
I didn’t drive, so I honestly don’t remember. Oops.

Why I’m watching
Alan's been on about it for years; he's a big fan of the director. And I'll admit, he got me excited for it.

So how was it?

Boyhood was filmed over the course of a decade, using all the same actors. The main character started at about 8 years old, up through 18. It was weird watching everyone age.

I liked it, I thought it was a worthwhile project, but it wasn’t exactly what I was expecting. It wasn’t as fun as it could have been. It wasn’t even as “deep” as it could have been. I didn’t love any of the characters, or even like them very much, but I could empathize with them and understand their decisions. It was just sort of… real. In a way, it was a little disappointing; at the same time, life is a little disappointing, and we see most of the characters go through that. You expect these awesome, meaningful things, but life just sort of happens, and you do the best you can.

Alan described it as “looking through a window at a real person.”

Anyway, I feel like this review is overly negative, and I don’t want to end it like that. It was a good movie, and absolutely worth seeing. It’s something that hasn’t been done before, and it’s an extremely realistic portrayal of life and all its little disappointments and challenges. The acting (except a few teen side characters) is fantastic. Each of the characters is a real complex person, not just the main character’s mom/dad/sister/etc. And I bet that those characters will resonate emotionally for a lot of people who have had similar life experiences. For me, only a few things were close enough to my life to really have an emotional impact: the divorced dad sharing music with his kids, the mom making ends meet (thankfully the only thing she had in common with mine), the teenage whatever and I’m bored.

Recommendation
For people who like portrayals of real life (and don’t need closure).

Feels
The movie didn’t hit me in the feels, really. Some of the decisions left me a little unsettled and annoyed at the characters, while still understanding them. 

Favorites
The cognitive dissonance when he walked into his elementary school classroom, and it looked like every elementary school classroom ever. Suddenly my brain is recognizing stupid posters, door art, reading slogans, fonts, etc. that were entirely forgotten back in the 90s.

Least favorites
Several scenes with teenage actors (other than the main characters) were not very good. There was one scene that felt like a horrible cheesy anti-drugs-and-alcohol PSA, complete with stilted conversation, overt peer pressure, and cheesy teen lingo. The whole movie seemed to put too much emphasis on alcohol, which was a little distracting. I get it: alcoholism is bad. Yeah, I guess teen drinking is sort of bad. But there’s no need to focus the camera meaningfully when random adults are pouring a glass of wine at a low-key party.

Related reading (or viewing):

• The decade-long filming has been done before in movies like American Promise, Paradise Lost, and the non-fiction Up series.

The Lays of Beleriand // J.R.R. Tolkien

Unfinished epic poems ; mainly the Ley of Leithian (following Beren and Luthien) and the the Lay of the Children of Hurin (following Turin). 

Where I got the book
A very expensive birthday and Christmas present.

Why I’m reading
I’ve loved Tolkien’s works since I read LoTR, but the Silmarillion really sealed my fate. The world he created is amazing.

Expectations
I’m halfway through this section right now. I remember expecting… well, more of the same, after finishing the BoLT. I was also expecting much more fragmentary works. 

So how was it?

The lays are… lays! They’re written as long poems. For some reason, I was not expecting that. I also wasn't expecting it to be so pleasant to read; I usually hate poetry. It reminds me of a fanfic drabble: every word chosen carefully, lots of rich details but nothing extraneous. Maybe when I have the house to myself I will read them aloud. {EDIT: I did, and it was amazing.}

"The Lay of Leithian" is the familiar story of Beren and Lúthien. The rhyming couplets are perfect for this story; I prefer it over all the other prose versions. It also has a lot more detail. "The Lay of the Children of Húrin" is in alliterative verse, and I enjoyed it, although maybe not as much. I don’t know a lot about poetry, but alliterative verse was a much better choice than rhyming couplets, since it’s a much darker story.

Favorites
Lúthien faces down Morgoth. She is brilliant as always, but it’s the characterization of Morgoth himself that gets to me: you can feel his hatred of the Valar, how convincing he can be, and how twisted his view of the world. [Lúthien faces down Morgoth. She is brilliant as always, but it’s the characterization of Morgoth himself that gets to me: you can feel his hatred of the Valar, how convincing he can be, and how twisted his view of the world. (hide spoiler)]

Least favorites
None of it is finished! Luckily we know how the stories end, but I would love to read them all the way through in verse.

Writing style
Alliterative verse and rhyming couplets.

The Book of Lost Tales // J.R.R. Tolkien

A collection of very early manuscripts, including early versions of stories later included in the Silmarillion ; edited and commentated by his son Christopher Tolkien.

Where I got the book
A very expensive birthday and Christmas present.

Why I’m reading
I’ve loved Tolkien’s works since I read LoTR, but the Silmarillion really sealed my fate. The world he created is amazing.

Expectations
I’m writing this having already started and finished the BoLT volumes, so I will try to remember my expectations going in. I did try to read a little bit of the HoME/UT as a teenager, in these awful paperback books, and just couldn’t get into it. So I expected a struggle. I also went into it with a huge preference for elves and elvish history, and wasn’t so excited to read stories about humans. In retrospect, I might have been struggling through The Children of Húrin back then...

So how was it?

First of all, what IS The Book of Lost Tales? It’s a collection of Tolkien’s unpublished and unfinished writings, brought together and annotated by his son Christopher Tolkien. It includes rejected ideas, drafts, outlines, and variations as well as comparisons and notes on the evolution of the texts. Ever wanted to know how Tolkien developed his iconic elves, what Melian was originally named, or a more detailed account of Gondolin? BoLT is your book.

No idea what I’m talking about? Check out my post on the works of J.R.R. Tolkien.

The BoLT blew my mind, especially Part I. These are Tolkien’s very early writings, before his concept of the world was fully developed. And wow, I’m very glad that he did develop it further. His elves were once decidedly closer to fairies and gnomes. He had an entirely different framework for telling these tales, one which he eventually (and in my opinion, rightly) discarded. Some of the concepts and ideas were very whimsical and childish (like “the cottage of lost play”) and don’t seem to fit Tolkien’s high-fantasy world.

Part II and the later sections of Part I are much closer to Tolkien’s finalized world. There are all sorts of familiar stories, not always “accurate” to published canon, but often with much more detail; most of these stories were revised and shortened before being added to the Silmarillion. The tales were not yet sewn together by the story of the Silmarils; the jewels were a side-story at best, and the Sons of Fëanor were not fully realized. I don’t think I appreciated how intricately Tolkien wove the Silmarillion together until I read BoLT.

Favorites
Glorfindel! He’s a side character at best, but one of my favorites. The BoLT contains the full narrative of the Fall of Gondolin, which is only summarized in the Silmarillion. Gondolin itself, while not a “character,” is one of my favorite sections, especially Tuor and Idril. I won’t lie; I broke out the sticky notes to mark Gondolin sections. The detailed variations on the creation story, the sun and moon, the trees, etc., were also wonderful. It was fascinating to watch the Silmaril narrative develop.

Least favorites
Oh god, Ælfwine. The original framework was the story of Ælfwine, an Englishman who journeys to an elven land and hears tales of elvish history. It ties the story together and embeds it into English history… but the entire thing is just too whimsical and fairytale-like. I love the sort of nonsense whimsy you find in children’s bedtime stories, but it just isn’t right for Tolkien’s world. [ The original framework was the story of Ælfwine, an Englishman who journeys to an elven land and hears tales of elvish history. It ties the story together and embeds it into English history… but the entire thing is just too whimsical and fairytale-like. I love the sort of nonsense whimsy you find in children’s bedtime stories, but it just isn’t right for Tolkien’s world. (hide spoiler)]

Writing style
Tolkien paints a wonderfully full, detailed, high-fantasy world, full of fantastic characters and beautiful scenery. Lots of repeated themes: betrayal, greed, love, oaths, etc. Many of the stories seemed darker than in the Silmarillion, which I very much appreciated.

I recently had a friend (a reader and a fantasy fan) complain that Tolkien “interrupts” his story too often. I can see where she’s coming from; but to insist that side stories like the Entwives were interruptions and just bad writing, not world-building? This is what happens when you speed read through everything, children. ಠ_ಠ

Finally, you can’t tackle BoLT without warning: CHRISTOPHER TOLKIEN IS SUPER PEDANTIC. No criticism is intended; it’s just that he has taken great pains to present and interpret his father’s drafts, notes, corrections, re-writes, name changes, etc. etc. as accurately as possible. So be prepared to read (or skip through) his analysis and explanations for every section.

Similar books

• Christopher Tolkien’s notes are similar to what you would find in a study Bible.
• Most of these stories can be found in their final form in the Silmarillion.
• The stories of Tuor and Eärendel are similar to the epic tales of Aeneas (the Aeneid) and Odysseus (the Odyssey) while Túrin’s is closer to the Oedipus tragedy.
• The story of Beren and Lúthien (Tinúviel) shares themes with Romeo and Juliet, although to me it has always felt like Baucis and Philemon. And, of course, it is similar to the love story between Arwen and Aragorn. 

The works of J.R.R. Tolkien

 

I started reading Tolkien a long, long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away (...ok, a decade ago in Fairfield). The books were a huge part of my teenage years. I re-read them every once in a while, so I’ll probably review Tolkien’s main works a bit later. But for now, I’m inching my way through three fat volumes of Tolkien’s unfinished work, published and annotated by his son Christopher. Believe me, it’s not for the faint of heart. (Or the sleepy, which is why it’s taking me so long).

But first! The shortest-guide-ever to reading Tolkien:

1. Start with The Hobbit. It’s comparatively short and an excellent introduction to Tolkien’s world.
2. Loved it? Move on the The Lord of the Rings. Did you find hobbits suuuper boring? Trust me: plow through the first few chapters, until they get out of the Shire, and it gets a lot more action-packed.
3. Can’t get enough of dem elves? The Silmarillion might be for you. It can be a tough read, with sections that are all mystical-abstract-y, passages that get deep into geography or genealogy, and lots and lots and lots of names. For me, that’s part of the charm, along with the long and intricate history it builds. If you hit a chunk that you just can’t get through, just skim to the next part.
4. If The Silmarillion was a little too “out there” for you, The Children of Húrin might be more your speed. It’s a darker adventure set around two human characters, compiled by Christoper Tolkien but formatted like a full story.
5. Found yourself obsessed with Tolkien after all? You probably don’t need me to tell you that The Unfinished Tales and The History of Middle Earth are next on your plate. These works were published by Christopher Tolkien, and never fully finished or integrated together; Chris does a lot of piecing-together and version-control. It’s not a light read, but some of the stories in there are absolutely worth it.

Finally, Encyclopedia Arda and Wikipedia's Middle-earth Portal are your friends :)

I’m currently working my way through The History of Middle Earth as well as The Unfinished Tales. The copies I have were published together in The Complete History of Middle Earth, three super-thick books with Bible-thin pages (that's them over on the left). So far I’m through the first two volumes of HoME and halfway through the third. That means I'm only halfway through the first big book. I’m going to review them separately, because they were actually published separately… and because that’s a whole lot of pages and stories to summarize in one place.

Hyperbole and a Half // Allie Brosh

“Unfortunate Situations, Flawed Coping Mechanisms, Mayhem, and Other Things That Happened ” ; a full-color graphic novel based on the eponymous webcomic.

So, I'm about two weeks out from graduating with my MLS, which means I actually have time to read books again! And look for a job. And let's be honest, TV too. I've been re-watching Star Trek and blogging that -- more reactions than reviews -- which inspired me to do the same for the books I read. I've never tried before, so we'll see.

I'll start with something I read fairly recently, and really loved: Hyperbole and a Half, a graphic novel (sort of) by Allie Brosh. Check out her blog (same idea, same name). If you spent any amount of time on the internet, you've probably encountered at least some of Brosh's work. The Alot is extremely popular, and her (clean) ALL the things! image is a pretty popular meme. Her work doesn't really look like a traditional graphic novel: it's definitely a web comic style of illustration, with chunky sort-of-stick-figures. It works.

She writes stories based on her life: her childhood, adulthood (mostly her dogs), and even her experience with depression. But these aren't your run-of-the-mill trips down memory lane. How do I put it nicely? She's NUTS. In the best of ways. She has this twisted, unique outlook on life - not at all dark, just... special. And honest. At times, incredibly insightful. I've never experienced depression, but I've heard many people say that hers was the most accurate description of depression they've ever encountered. I know that I found it very empathetic, and (I'm not sure how) still incredibly funny. But if you're not interested in reading about depression, please don't let that turn you off from her work; it's just another topic she turns her unique attention to, right next to the simple dog and the Alot.

I'll be honest: there are some duplicated stories from her blog, and she definitely has some blog posts that are funnier. You won't meet the Alot in her book, either (and yes, a lot of people are complaining.) But it was absolutely worth reading.